Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu - Centralny punkt logowania
Strona główna

Global Governance and the Rule of Law in Poland and Abroad

Informacje ogólne

Kod przedmiotu: 1300-GG-RlPA-KPP
Kod Erasmus / ISCED: (brak danych) / (brak danych)
Nazwa przedmiotu: Global Governance and the Rule of Law in Poland and Abroad
Jednostka: Wydział Prawa i Administracji
Grupy: Przedmioty w ramach Kursu Prawa Porównawczego
Punkty ECTS i inne: 6.00 Podstawowe informacje o zasadach przyporządkowania punktów ECTS:
  • roczny wymiar godzinowy nakładu pracy studenta konieczny do osiągnięcia zakładanych efektów uczenia się dla danego etapu studiów wynosi 1500-1800 h, co odpowiada 60 ECTS;
  • tygodniowy wymiar godzinowy nakładu pracy studenta wynosi 45 h;
  • 1 punkt ECTS odpowiada 25-30 godzinom pracy studenta potrzebnej do osiągnięcia zakładanych efektów uczenia się;
  • tygodniowy nakład pracy studenta konieczny do osiągnięcia zakładanych efektów uczenia się pozwala uzyskać 1,5 ECTS;
  • nakład pracy potrzebny do zaliczenia przedmiotu, któremu przypisano 3 ECTS, stanowi 10% semestralnego obciążenia studenta.
Język prowadzenia: angielski
Wymagania wstępne:

(tylko po angielsku) Good knowledge of English

Rodzaj przedmiotu:

uzupełnienie kanonu

Całkowity nakład pracy studenta:

(tylko po angielsku) Number or hours with the lecturer:

- participation in the lectures - 20 hours

-Individual time required for self study:

Preparation for the classes – 80 hours

Preparation for the essay – 40 hours

consultations with the lecturer – 10 hours


Total: 150 hours (6 ECTS)

Efekty uczenia się - wiedza:

(tylko po angielsku) Within the scope of knowledge:


1.The goal is to make students knowledgeable about the leading issues of global governance:

Student knows major philosophical issues involved in the field of global governance and is able to sort and compare different themes according to existence of reciprocal links between them.


2.To make students knowledgeable with representative texts that touch on main problems concerning global governance:

Student becomes familiar with philosophical concepts supporting analysis of the main global governance issues, he/she can assign them to specific authors and point out to philosophers dealing with particular subjects.


3. Shaping consciousness of the students about the importance and significance - for science and society - of reflection on issues of global governance:

Students are able to identify the relationship between the issues of epistemology and scientific and social problems. Students are able to assess the degree of interrelation between the theoretical and the practical aspects of discussed problems.


Efekty uczenia się - umiejętności:

(tylko po angielsku) Within the scope of skills:


1.Gaining skills in the ability to analyze scientific text and undertake discussion around above-mentioned topics:

The student explores and analysis scientific texts in the light of particular problems, he/she can present them and be critical about them.


2.Gaining skills in the efficient use of specialized terminology and presenting workable hypotheses within above-mentioned topics:

The student can present the arguments from selected texts and independently problematise selected issues in the philosophy of human rights.


Efekty uczenia się - kompetencje społeczne:

(tylko po angielsku) Within the scope of social skills:


1.Gaining skills in examining scientific problems and be critical about them.


2.Gaining skills in reproducing the arguments of the selected texts and self problematizing selected issues of contemporary discourse of global governance.


3.Gaining skills in indicating relationships between the issues of epistemology and scientific and social problems. Understanding their mutual influence and shaping ability to assess the degree of theoretical and practical problems.

Skrócony opis: (tylko po angielsku)

Global governance is understood as “a dynamic process in which legal, political and economical arrangements unleash interests, change the balance of force, and lead to further reinvention of the governance scheme itself.”1 We need to come up with innovative approaches to global policy in the face of a legal and institutional architecture manifestly ill-equipped to address our most urgent global challenges.

1. Dawid Kennedy, The Mystery of Global Governance, 34 Ohio Northern University Law Review 827-860 (2008), p. 832

Pełny opis: (tylko po angielsku)

Global governance is understood as “a dynamic process in which legal, political and economical arrangements unleash interests, change the balance of force, and lead to further reinvention of the governance scheme itself.” We need to come up with innovative approaches to global policy in the face of a legal and institutional architecture manifestly ill-equipped to address our most urgent global challenges. Poverty, conflict, injustice and inequality are also legal and institutional regimes that we can study on the basis of the Polish legal and political system taking the global order as a reference point. Present challenges to the liberal legal order in Poland and in the Western countries motivates us to think to present renewed architecture of the national and international legal order. Global governance research explores the ways in which they are reproduced and what might be done in response to propose a useful de lege ferenda approach that could be reflected upon by the legislators . The aim of the course is to provide a platform for new thinking about Polish legal order and international legal and institutional arrangements in the world of an urgent need for responsibility for the future. It also aims to present what role can Poland and Europe play in this process. Is global governance possible? Is wider responsibility possible?

Literatura: (tylko po angielsku)

1. Benhabib Seyla, Dignity in adversity.

2. Feinstein Lee, Slaughter Anne-Marie, A duty to prevent, Forreign Affairs, Volume 83,No1.

3. Kissinger Henry A. ,The future of U.S.- Chinese Relations, Conflict is a Choice, Not a Necessity.

4. Brzezinski Z., The grand chessboard, 1997.

5. Inglehart Ronald, Welzel Christian, How development. leads to democracy, What we know about modernization

6. Introduction.

7. Denniston Lyle, Opinion recap: Backing off a human rights cases.

8. Haugen Gary, Boutros Victor, And justice for all, Enforcing Human Rights for the World’s Poor.

9. Ajami Fouad, The Arab sprong at One, A year of Living Dangerously.

10. Shirky Clay, The political Power of Social Media, Technology, the Public Sphere, and Political Change.

11. Hirst Paul, Globalization in questions, Multinational Companies and the Internalization of Business Activity.

12. Fukuyama F, America at the crossroads 2006, Rethinking Institutions for World Order.

13. Birdsall Nancy, Fukuyama Francis, The Post-Washington Consensus, Development After the Crisis.

14. Sachs Jeffrey, The end of poverty, Why we should do it.

15. Danielsen Dan, Corporate power and global order.

16. Chomsky Noam, Imperial ambitions 2005, Another world is possible.

17. Lieberman Robert, Why the rich are getting richer, American Politics and the Second Gilded Age.

18. Riles Anne Lise, Aspiration and control International legal rhetoric and the essentialization of culture.

19. Kennedy David, International Law and the 19th century: history of an illusion.

20. Smolar Aleksander, In search for Hope and Pardigm.

21. Krauthammer Charles,The Unipolar Moment Revisited, The National Interest- winter 2002/03.

22. Ash Timoty Garton, The crisis of Europe, How the Union came Together and why It’s Falling apart.

23. Brooks Stephen, Wohlforth William C., Reshaping the World Order, How Washington Should Reform International Institutions.

24. Levinson Marc, Faulty Basel, Why More Diplomacy Won’t Keep the Financial System Safe.

25. Etzioni Amitai, Tomorrow’s Institution Today, The Promise of the Proliferation Security Initiative.

26. Zoellick Robert B., why We still Need the World Bank, Looking Beyond Aid.

27. A global compact to end poverty.

28. Sachs Jeffrey, The end of poverty, Our generation’s challenge (chapter 18).

29. Schwab Susan C., After Doha, Why the negotiations are doomed and what we should do about it.

30. Moravsik Andrew, Striking a new transatlantic Bargain.

31. Slaughter Anne- Marie, America’s Edge, Power in the Networked Century.

32. Fukuyama Francis, State Building, Governance and world order in the 21st century, Cornell University Press, Ithaca, New York, 2012.

33. Cooper Robert, The Breaking of Nations, Introduction to Order and Chaos in the twenty-first Century, + the old World Order ??

34. Cooper Robert, The Breaking of Nations, Order and Chaos in the twenty-first Century, State interest.

35. Moravcsik Andrew, In the defence of the “democtaric Deficit”: Reassessing Legitimacy in te European Union,JCMS 2002 Volume 40. Number 4. Pp. 603-24.

36. Friedman Thomas L., The world is flat, Globalization of the Local, The Cultural Revolution Is About to Begin (chapter 12), Penguin Books.

37. Betts Richard K., Conflict or Cooperation? Three visions revisited.

38. Coleman Isobel, The global glass eiling, Why empowering Women is Good for Business.

39. Sincair Timothy J., Global Governance, Introduction.

40. The Polish Model, A conversation with Radek Sikorski.

41. Brzezinski Zbigniew, Strategic Vision 2012, The World After America by 2025, not Chinese but Chaotic.

42. Brzezinski Zbigniew, Second Chance 2008, Beyond 2008.

43. Fukuyama Francis, America at the Crossroads 2006, A Different Kind of American Foreign Policy.

44. Ikenberry John G., The Future of the Liberal World Order, Internatioalism After America.

45. Walzer Michael, On Humanitarism, Is Helping Others Charity, or Duty, or Both?

46. Council on Foreign Relations, Summary: Symposium on the United States and the future of Global Governance, May 2009, New York.

47. Harvard Kennedy School, John F. Kennedy School of Government, Kiobel and corporate social responsibility, An Issues Brief by John G. Ruggie.

48. Lula Da Silva, Now is the time for Politics, More government is the solution, not the problem, and key to solving poverty.

49. Brzezinski Zbigniew, How to Avoid a New Cold War.

50. Kaplan Steven N., The Real Story Behind Executive Pay, The Myth of Crony Capitalism.

51. Thornburgh Nathan, The Case For Amnesty.

Metody i kryteria oceniania: (tylko po angielsku)

Written essay and active participation in the class

Criteria:

0-59% failed

60%-69% - sufficient

70%-85% - good

86%- 100% - very good

Praktyki zawodowe: (tylko po angielsku)

no applicable

Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2021/22" (zakończony)

Okres: 2022-02-21 - 2022-09-30
Wybrany podział planu:
Przejdź do planu
Typ zajęć:
Wykład, 20 godzin więcej informacji
Koordynatorzy: Marcin Kilanowski
Prowadzący grup: (brak danych)
Lista studentów: (nie masz dostępu)
Zaliczenie: Przedmiot - Zaliczenie na ocenę
Wykład - Zaliczenie na ocenę

Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2022/23" (zakończony)

Okres: 2023-02-20 - 2023-09-30
Wybrany podział planu:
Przejdź do planu
Typ zajęć:
Wykład, 20 godzin więcej informacji
Koordynatorzy: Marcin Kilanowski
Prowadzący grup: (brak danych)
Lista studentów: (nie masz dostępu)
Zaliczenie: Przedmiot - Zaliczenie na ocenę
Wykład - Zaliczenie na ocenę

Zajęcia w cyklu "Semestr letni 2023/24" (w trakcie)

Okres: 2024-02-20 - 2024-09-30
Wybrany podział planu:
Przejdź do planu
Typ zajęć:
Wykład, 20 godzin więcej informacji
Koordynatorzy: Marcin Kilanowski
Prowadzący grup: (brak danych)
Lista studentów: (nie masz dostępu)
Zaliczenie: Przedmiot - Zaliczenie na ocenę
Wykład - Zaliczenie na ocenę
Uwagi: (tylko po angielsku)

Dates of the classes:

10th of May (4 hours)

17th of May (4 hours)

24th of May (4 hours)

31st of June (4 hours)

7th of June (4 hours)

14th of June (2.5 hours)

Opisy przedmiotów w USOS i USOSweb są chronione prawem autorskim.
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
ul. Jurija Gagarina 11, 87-100 Toruń tel: +48 56 611-40-10 https://usosweb.umk.pl/ kontakt deklaracja dostępności USOSweb 7.0.3.0-1 (2024-04-02)