MA seminar [2510-f2ENG1W-MA]
Semestr zimowy 2018/19
Seminarium,
grupa nr 3
plan zajęć przedmiotu| Przedmiot: | MA seminar [2510-f2ENG1W-MA] | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zajęcia: |
Semestr zimowy 2018/19 [2018/19Z]
(zakończony)
Seminarium [SEM], grupa nr 3 [pozostałe grupy] |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Termin i miejsce:
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Terminy najbliższych spotkań:
Kliknij w datę by zobaczyć tygodniowy plan z zaznaczonym spotkaniem. |
Wszystkie zajęcia tej grupy już się odbyły - pokaż terminy wszystkich spotkań.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Liczba osób w grupie: | 9 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Limit miejsc: | 10 | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zaliczenie: | Zaliczenie na ocenę | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Prowadzący: | Waldemar Skrzypczak | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Literatura: |
(tylko po angielsku) • Fauconnier, Gilles. 2001. “Conceptual Blending and Analogy”, in: D. Gentner, K. J. Holyoak, B. N. Kokinov (eds.), The Analogical Mind, Cambridge Mass./London, England, A Bradford Book MIT, 255-286. • Lakoff, George and M. Johnson. 1980. Metaphors We Live By. (Afterword 2003). University of Chicago Press.Chicago. • Lakoff, George. 1993. “Contemporary Theory of Metaphor”, in: A. Ortony (ed.).Metaphor and Thought, • Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 202-251 • Langacker, Ronald W. 1990. Concept, Image and Symbol. Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin/New York. • Langacker, Ronald W. 2000. Grammar and Conceptualization. Mouton de Gruyter. Berlin/New York. • Skrzypczak, Waldemar. 2006. Analog-Based Modelling of Meaning Representations in English. N. Copernicus University Press. Toruń. • Matthews, Peter. H. Oxford Concise Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford University Press. Oxford - New York. Tarsk. R. L. 1999. (edited by Peter Stockwell 2007). Language and Linguistics: The Key Concepts. Routledge.Oxon. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Zakres tematów: |
(tylko po angielsku) The goal of the MA seminar in linguistics IMAGE AND MEANING CONSTRUCTION IN LANGUAGE in term three is to carry out a thorough revision of theoretical distinctions and methodological prerequisites, and a consolidation of the above elements towards the materialization of a selected research project. • A thorough revision of terminological distinctions regarding descriptive linguistics, textual analysis, linguistic pragmatics and cognitive linguistics. • The revision of the guiding principles concerning research methodology (scope/domain and object[s] of study, theoretical perspective[s]). • The presentation of expository elements regarding the domain of study and theoretical perspective[s](based on literature) by the students. The presentation of objects (linguistic data) classified according to selected criteria of sudivision consistent with methodology by the students. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Metody dydaktyczne: |
(tylko po angielsku) Tutorials, mini-lectures, presentations of individual projects, individualized instruction |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Metody i kryteria oceniania: |
(tylko po angielsku) Active participation during seminars (10%) Presentation of results in class (30%) Presentation of results in the form of written chapters and sections (for submission) (50%) Final test/in a work-sheet format (20%) Active involvement (20%) Preparation for classes (20%) Analytic tasks, essays and work-sheets (20%) Final test (40%) Very good – 91-100% (5.0) Good plus – 86-90% (4+) Good – 76-85% (4.0) Satisfactory plus – 70-75% (3+) Satisfactory – 60-69% (3.0) Fail – 0-59% (2) |
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
| Uwagi: |
W. Skrzypczak - językoznawstwo - I rok, filologia angielska s2 |
Właścicielem praw autorskich jest Uniwersytet Mikołaja Kopernika w Toruniu.
